| Blog
& Buzz
Many
thanks to our guest bloggers last
month:
Debbie
Weil: Blogging
Your Way to Free Publicity
Michael Katz: Size
Matters
Tom Sant : Filter
out the Fluff
Deborah Kluge: Make
Your Next Proposal a Winner
Other
posts and articles:
Marketing
Profs, Rules for Rainmakers,
February 2005
CRMindustry.com,
Dos and Don’ts for Customer-Focused
Web Sites, February 2005
Don't
answer client questions until
you know what you're getting into.
Guerrilla Consulting blog,
3/02/05
Stamp
out deliverables! Guerrilla
Consulting blog, 2/27/05
What
kind of emotional experience do you
provide for your clients? We
discuss how this can be a competitive
advantage in the Guerrilla
Consulting blog, 2/25/05
What
business are you in? Can you explain
it so your grandmother understands?
Guerrilla Consulting blog,
2/21/05
How
much should you give away? Do
it right and end up with more. Guerrilla
Consulting blog, 2/22/05
The
Advertising Show. Listen to an
interview with Mike McLaughlin, 2/05
|
| Additional
Resources for Consultants
Management
Consulting News
Interviews with consulting leaders,
articles, research results, job data,
and news. This
month:
» Interview:
Wharton marketing professor Jerry
Wind shows us how to break through
existing patterns of thought to tap
fresh ideas.
» Article:
Most marketers pore over data bases
to discern customer behavior, and
to make decisions. Professional service
firms are the exception. Consultant,
Suzanne Lowe, discusses why data mining
is so underused.
Read these articles and more in the
March Management Consulting News
Guerrilla
Consulting Web site
Guerrilla
Consulting blog |
|
The
Guerrilla Consultant –
a newsletter dedicated to applying the principles
of Guerrilla Marketing to the work and lives of
consultants.
Welcome
When
you submit a proposal, you can bet that one of
the first sections your client reads is the explanation
of fees. Even if a client says that price isn’t
the determining factor in selecting a consultant,
it’s always important.
Many
of the typical requests a consultant receives
during fee discussions, like requests for discounts,
can be eliminated by using the six strategies
described in this month’s article. Put these
practices in place during the proposal process
and you’ll get a fair fee, while avoiding
those nail-biting fee negotiations.
Mike
McLaughlin
Co-Author, Guerrilla Marketing for Consultants
Six
Strategies to Get Paid What You’re Worth
Some years ago, my wife and I decided to remodel
our outdated kitchen. Through referrals and research,
we found a contractor and conveyed our vision
to him so he could prepare a proposal.
The contractor understood what we wanted and
contributed some great ideas. We worked well together
and were excited about the project—until
we got to the pricing discussions. That’s
when the contractor’s interests diverged
from ours; the tense negotiations about price
strained the relationship with the contractor
and nearly scotched the deal.
Consultants
face a similar dilemma. Things will be humming
along nicely as you exchange productive ideas
with a client. But when you ultimately come to
the subject of fees, the interests of the client
and the consultant often head in opposite directions:
|
The
Reality of Consulting Fees |
|
Clients
Want... |
Consultants
Want... |
| Lower
fees |
Fair
fees |
| Pay
for performance |
Pay
for play |
| Guaranteed
results |
Guaranteed
payment |
| Predictability |
Flexibility |
| Risk
avoidance |
Risk
sharing |
Clients and consultants alike usually dread fee
discussions. Here are six strategies to help you
preserve your profit margins and your client relationships
as you work through pricing discussions.
Begin
with Benefits
I
once received a single-page proposal from a consultant
that contained a one-paragraph project recap,
a proposed fee, and a space for my signature of
approval. I’m a big fan of short proposals,
but this was one for the record book.
I asked how the consultant had derived the fee
and the only answer I could get was, “That’s
our fee for this type of work.” The number—which
was a big one—seemed arbitrary and I judged
it to be unacceptable.
Instead of springing an unsubstantiated fee on
a client, start every sales process by identifying
the client’s desired benefits, and then
quantify them. It’s hard work, but it pays
off when you eventually get to a discussion of
fees. With a credible estimate of benefits, the
client has a powerful context to evaluate whether
or not your proposed fee is a good deal.
Most of your competitors rely on the old stand-bys
to justify fees, like their tools, references,
and illustrious history. Don’t ignore these.
But focus on how you’ll help the client
achieve the expected benefits of a project, and
you’ll leave competitors in the dust.
Know
Four Reasons Why
Clients roll their eyes when they talk about how
consultants come up with their fees. To them,
it’s a black box. Address that by being
prepared to give clients at least four good answers
to the question, “How did you come up with
the fee?”
Every project is unique in some way. Discuss
those nuances and how each impacts fees. Your
fee will be driven by factors such as project
complexity, duration, scope, expected value, team
size, and risk. Whatever strategy you use to develop
a fee, even if it’s a simple hourly rate,
don’t make it a mystery for clients.
Beware
of Ballpark Estimates
Clients frequently ask consultants for “ballpark”
fee estimates before all the project facts are
on the table. From the client perspective, it’s
a legitimate question and every consultant should
expect to hear it.
The danger with ballpark estimates is that they
tend to stick in clients’ minds. More than
one consultant has lost work because an off-the-cuff
estimate was in the ‘wrong’ ballpark.
Tossing out fee estimates before you’ve
grasped the nuances of a project can put you in
a tough position once you’ve arrived at
a proposed fee.
If your actual fee differs from your ballpark
estimate—and it usually does—you have
to begin the conversation about fees by explaining
all the reasons why your ballpark number missed
the mark, not why the fee is appropriate for the
job at hand. That’s not the only problem.
Often, the client uses the ballpark number to
seek preliminary approval for the project. So,
if that number is off, the client has to do some
fast talking to explain to others why the preliminary
budget is wrong before the project begins.
Your prospective client will be frustrated if
you stonewall the ballpark estimate question,
but resist the pressure. Ask for some breathing
room to create a fee estimate that’s based
on fact, not fiction. Create your estimate carefully,
but quickly, and you and the client won’t
end up in a classic ‘lose-lose’ situation.
Negotiate
Scope, Not Price
From the client’s standpoint, settling on
the price of professional services is like purchasing
hand-me-downs at a neighborhood garage sale: Everything
is negotiable.
If your client is pushing for a fee reduction,
congratulate yourself. It’s almost always
a buying signal. Most often, the resistance means
the client is satisfied with your proposal, and
now the client’s goal is to drive a good
bargain.
Follow one simple rule: don’t cut your
fee without a commensurate reduction in project
scope or some other element of the project. If
your client wants to pay less, that’s fine.
Work with the client to find ways to complete
the project at a reduced fee.
Some consultants complain that competitive pressures,
like a lower-cost bidder, cause them to cut fees
without a reduction in scope. The price-cutting
consultant sends an unmistakable message to the
client: don’t trust the first number you
see from the consultant.
Once you’ve compromised your position by
offering a discount, expect discount requests
on every future proposal you give to that client.
The client has nothing to lose by asking for a
discount. Before you reduce a project fee, make
sure you’re making a fair exchange.
Negotiate
with the Client, Not with Yourself
When a sale is imminent, it’s easy for a
consultant to get swept up in the moment. The
consultant’s thoughts drift to the ancillary
benefits of serving a new client: selling follow-on
work, developing new relationships, securing a
reference client, improving industry visibility,
and the opportunity to do new and different work.
As the consultant engages in an internal dialogue
about these benefits, the stakes for closing the
sale begin to rise. The consultant might think,
“The potential for creating a stronger and
more profitable practice in the future could ride
on landing this project.” This line of reasoning
often leads a consultant to consider reducing
fees in an effort to get the work.
Every project will present some non-project benefits.
If you’re lowering fees based on those expectations,
you’re negotiating the fee with yourself,
instead of your client. More often than not, you’ll
leave money on the table when you negotiate with
yourself.
Don’t
Price on Futures
Some consultants reduce fees for the initial phase
of a project in the misguided belief that such
a gesture will set them up for winning future
projects at higher rates. This strategy rarely
works.
Most consultants find it nearly impossible to
push rates to pre-discount levels simply because
a new phase of a project is gearing up. If you
want to try for higher rates, prepare for resistance.
Once you establish a client’s perception
of your value, it’s going to take more than
a new project phase to change that perception.
Resist
promises of future work, and let those consultants
who “buy” work walk away with the
non-profitable first phase. For most clients,
subsequent project phases won’t be awarded
without competition, so stay close to your client
contact. It’s likely your time will come,
and you won’t have to make such a risky
investment.
What
are your experiences with getting paid
what you're worth? Join
the discussion over at the Guerrilla Consulting
blog and let me know.
|